Thanks to everyone that are sending in reports. BTW, I've seen a few comments on fishing reports complaining about the brevity of the report and lack of "useful information". Here's my take on a fishing report submission. I love reading the detailed, entertaining reports, but I'm also perfectly happy when someone sends a one sentence report. A brief fishing report is better than no fishing report. I wish we wouldn't criticize anglers for actually submitting a fishing report, no matter how short. Even a brief report builds the database. For example, if someone posts a "5" rating that number goes into the data base to formulate trends and historical reports. So all reports are helpful in that respect. If you're a Premium Member the Historical Reports tool allows you to analyze the best periods to fish particular bodies of water. And the more reports we have the more accurate these trends will become.
More important, someone that sends in a report is actually taking the time to contribute to WL.com. Even with all the reports that are getting submitted, it's still only a very small percentage of the total number of anglers that visit the site each month. We should be thanking people for posting reports, not criticizing because it doesn't meet our expectations of what a fishing report should be.
So thanks again everyone, it's been a lot of fun reading and approving all these reports!
